I may have missed some threads, but I thought we were discussing 1) Integration Blueprints (architecture) 2) Functional Blueprints (components) I agree with some of the other comments that we risk spr

I think many (most?) vendors who submit a blueprint do intend to support the exact specification of the blueprint they submit. Either as an in-house solution, or commercially as an ecosystem vendor. I

Yes, thank you Wenjing That is what I was referring to – I think an integration project and a functional project are very different and the blueprints for each would be substantially different enough

I don’t love the idea of using the term BluePrint for the functional development projects. I think the term is already overloaded enough, and there is already some confusion between the term blueprint